Commentaires sur : 7 techniques simples d’écriture inclusive (sans point médian) https://communicationinclusive.fr/ecriture-inclusive-sans-point-median/ Une communication inclusive adaptée à votre cible Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:55:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.12 Par : Charlotte Adjutor-Marti https://communicationinclusive.fr/ecriture-inclusive-sans-point-median/#comment-2900 Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:55:01 +0000 https://communicationinclusive.fr/?p=6611#comment-2900 En réponse à ROBIN.

It’s all about context. Synonyms aren’t interchangeable all the time. I only offer examples of gender-neutral alternatives, you can pick and choose which word you use.

]]> Par : ROBIN https://communicationinclusive.fr/ecriture-inclusive-sans-point-median/#comment-2877 Sat, 20 Dec 2025 10:17:12 +0000 https://communicationinclusive.fr/?p=6611#comment-2877 Each of these proposed substitutions in your first bullet point completely misses the point of inclusive language. Instead of neutralising gender, they change the meaning, sometimes drastically. They’re not inclusive — they’re inaccurate.

« expert » → « spécialiste »
What’s wrong
“Spécialiste” is indeed gender‑neutral — but it is not a synonym for “expert”.
– Expert implies a high level of mastery, often formally recognised.
– Spécialiste simply means someone who works in a particular field.
You can be a spécialiste without being an expert.
Replacing one with the other dilutes the meaning and erases a level of competence.

I’ll leave it at that. I favour inclusive language, but not at the cost of accuracy of meaning.

]]>